Download e-book for iPad: A Book of Legal Lists: The Best and Worst in American Law, by Bernard Schwartz

By Bernard Schwartz

ISBN-10: 0195109619

ISBN-13: 9780195109610

ISBN-10: 0195125029

ISBN-13: 9780195125023

ISBN-10: 0198026943

ISBN-13: 9780198026945

Who're the head ten maximum splendid courtroom Justices of all time? who're the worst ten? Which splendid court docket selection helped result in the Civil warfare? What are the 10 maximum and worst splendid court docket judgements? What are the 10 most sensible court docket videos? Who used to be the final to exploit the perfect court docket spittoon? Who was once the 1st Justice to put on trousers underneath his excellent court docket robes?
From John Marshall, the best ultimate courtroom Justice, to Alfred Moore, one of many worst, Bernard Schwartz's A ebook of criminal Lists--the first ever compiled--provides the 10 Bests and Worsts in American legislations (and additionally contains solutions to a hundred and fifty minutiae questions on the criminal world). The lists comprise the best dissents and ultimate courtroom "might have beens;" maximum non-Supreme courtroom judges (Lemuel Shaw, number 1 at the maximum checklist, performed a well-known position in recasting universal legislations into an American mold); maximum and worst non-Supreme court docket judgements; maximum legislation books; attorneys (including Alexander Hamilton, Clarence Darrow "Attorney for the Damned", and Abraham Lincoln); trials; and maximum felony movies. every one checklist access has a quick essay via Schwartz explaining why it's a top or a worst, and it's in those essays that we achieve a wealth of data in regards to the criminal international. We examine, for example, that Sherman Minton, quantity ten at the Worst splendid court docket Justices checklist, used to be one of these nonentity that he will be top remembered because the final to take advantage of the spittoon supplied for every Justice at the back of the bench. earlier than he turned leader Justice, William H. Rehnquist used to be identified for taking part in Trivial Pursuit at the bench, Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote 873 evaluations for the courtroom (the so much in its history), and Roger Brooke Taney, quantity ten at the maximum superb court docket Justices checklist, was once the 1st leader Justice to put on trousers underneath his gowns (his predecessors had continuously given judgment in knee breeches).
Stretching again to the early 1700s, the legislations and the judges who interpret it have maintained a gentle presence in our lives--sometimes for higher, occasionally for worse. From disappointments like Plessy v. Ferguson (number at the Ten Worst excellent courtroom judgements list), which gave the deceive the yank excellent "that all males are created equal," to lesser recognized yet no less significant judgements corresponding to the 1933 United States v. One publication known as "Ulysses", (number 9 at the Ten maximum Non-Supreme courtroom judgements) the landmark First modification case that eased the legislation governing censorship, Bernard Schwartz presents criminal specialists and non-experts alike with unique details in a structure that may be came upon nowhere else.

Show description

Read Online or Download A Book of Legal Lists: The Best and Worst in American Law, with 150 Court and Judge Trivia Questions PDF

Best rules & procedures books

New PDF release: Civil Procedure 2 e

Civil process presents an fundamental consultant either to scholars of civil process in any respect degrees in addition to practitioners who on a regular basis need to grapple with the CPR.

Download PDF by R. A. Duff: Punishment, Communication, and Community (Studies in Crime

The query "What can justify legal punishment ? " turns into in particular insistent from time to time, like our personal, of penal challenge, whilst critical doubts are raised not just concerning the justice or efficacy of specific modes of punishment, yet concerning the very legitimacy of the entire penal procedure. fresh theorizing approximately punishment bargains numerous solutions to that question-answers that try and make believable experience of the concept that punishment is justified as being deserved for earlier crimes; solutions that attempt to establish a few precious effects when it comes to which punishment could be justified; in addition to abolitionist solutions telling us that we should always search to abolish, instead of to justify, felony punishment.

Non-trial Advocacy: A Case Study Approach by Stephen Nathanson PDF

Legal professionals use non-trial advocacy talents in courtroom for pre- and post-trial submissions. they're more straightforward to profit than trial advocacy abilities, and are even more correct to the paintings of so much new legal professionals. This e-book examines all key facets of legal and civil non-trial advocacy, together with bail functions, pleas in mitigation and period in-between functions made through the process civil activities.

Experts in Civil Cases: An Inside View (Law and Society) - download pdf or read online

Prichard penetrates the hidden areas of product legal responsibility disputes, such a lot of that are settled via negotiation. the main decisive negotiation in product situations happens among medical specialists and legal professionals at the comparable part. every one needs to deal with their very own conflicting expert pursuits. by the point most of the people sees it, such situations have passed through numerous revisions, radical shifts in nature, and corresponding shifts within the roles and relative dominance of the gamers.

Additional resources for A Book of Legal Lists: The Best and Worst in American Law, with 150 Court and Judge Trivia Questions

Sample text

After Frankfurter delivered his opinion upholding a compulsory flag salute, he was talking about the opinion 24 A Book of Legal Lists over cocktails at the Roosevelt home in Hyde Park. Eleanor Roosevelt, in her impulsive way, declared that, regardless of the Justice's learning and legal skills, there was something wrong with an opinion that forced little children to salute a flag when such a ceremony was repugnant to their consciences. To critics, there was only hypocrisy in Frankfurter's constant insistence that he could not reach judgments on the bench that he would readily have favored as a private citizen.

His distrust of corporations did not make him disregard the practical possibilities of the corporate device and its utility in an expanding economy. " The judgment of history has confirmed Clay's estimate. The pendulum has shifted from the post-Dred Scoff censures to the more sober estimate of Justice Frankfurter: "The devastation of the Civil War for a long time obliterated the truth about Taney. And the blaze of Marshall's glory will permanently overshadow him. " The Also-Rans—Justices on Other Lists I am, of course, not alone in my attempt to draw up a list of the greatest Justices.

Have been recently placed on the bench—such shallow metaphysical hairsplitters as P. P. " A year earlier, the most important Barbour opinion had been delivered—the opinion of the Court in New York v. Miln, where a state law required ship masters to make detailed reports on all passengers brought into New York. Bonds had to be given for each foreigner brought in, and the masters had to remove at their own expense any foreigners likely to become public charges. " He did not teach constitutional law to Justice Barbour.

Download PDF sample

A Book of Legal Lists: The Best and Worst in American Law, with 150 Court and Judge Trivia Questions by Bernard Schwartz

by Donald

Rated 4.45 of 5 – based on 49 votes